Thank goodness someone is stepping up to challenge this:
Lawsuit challenges new 'e-annoyance' law
Here's what they say:
" The challenge to the 'annoy' law, filed in federal district court in Arizona, asks for a preliminary injunction barring federal prosecutors from enforcing the rule. It claims the law's invocation of the word 'annoy' is 'ambiguous, overbroad and vague' and violates the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. "
Go get em. Or at least really annoy em!
[my previous post on this]
2 comments:
i agree, nice post
!Santa
Hey Sean -- thanks for the support; it's great to hear from Cleveland (my family lived in Cleveland Hts; brother went to Case Medical Sch, Dad was at Cleveland Clinic)! Hope you kick that smoking deal and say hi to the old place for me. --W
Post a Comment